DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
, Ot S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2496 .
CRS
‘Docket No: .13097-12
‘14 May 2014.
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2013. Your allegation of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the’ existence of probable material
error or injustice. ©
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 7 February
2001. On 20 March 2007 you received: nonjudicial punishment for
Sexual harassment. Your last enlisted evaluation for the period
16 June 2006 to 15 June 2007 showed that you were hot:
recommended for retention. ‘On 6-July 2007, ‘you were honorably
released from active duty due. to completion of required service,
and assigned an RE-4 ‘(not recommended for reténtion) reentry:
code. eee = ae
The Board carefully considered your desire to continue your
career in the Navy Reserve; however, it was not persuaded that
your RE-4 reentry code was assigned in-error, or that its
continued presence in your record is unjust due to your
misconduct and non-recommendation for retention. Accordingly,
your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice,
Sincerely,
Te SS ie
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06145-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2012. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10529-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5810 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. On 4 April 2008, you were discharged with a general characterization of service due to unsatisfactory participation and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5631 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 duly 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all ‘material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09858-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on.21 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in the reentry code given your SCM conviction of serious...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09936-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2007. On 18 July 2006 the NPC advised your command that ASN had approved the recommendation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04231-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ybur application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 19 January 2007, you were honorably released from active duty due a reduction in force and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01065-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5194 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2014. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 September 2005. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ,existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06836-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2011. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.